Ex Parte Migliorini et al - Page 17




                 Appeal No. 2004-2292                                                                               
                 Application No. 09/747,537                                                                         

                 21).  Peiffer further discloses the core layer preferably comprises 2% to 10%                      
                 by weight of a hydrocarbon resin.  (Col. 5, ll. 8-22).                                             
                        The Blemberg reference has been discussed above.  The Examiner                              
                 determined that “it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the                        
                 art to blend the olefinic polymer comprising the sealable layer of Peiffer                         
                 into the core layer in amounts sufficient to improve adhesion of the core to                       
                 the skin layers.  (Answer, p. 10).                                                                 
                        Appellants argue that the teachings and suggestions of Blemberg                             
                 are inapplicable to the Peiffer reference.  Appellants rely on the arguments                       
                 presented in response to the rejection over the combined teachings of                              
                 Schloegl and Blemberg.  (Brief, p. 10).                                                            
                        Here again, we are not persuaded by Appellants arguments.  We                               
                 rely on our discussion presented when discussing the rejection over the                            
                 combined teachings of Schloegl and Blemberg above and add the                                      
                 following.  Peiffer discloses that the core layer also preferably comprises an                     
                 ethylene-propylene copolymer.  (Col. 3, ll. 39-41).  This additional                               
                 copolymer would function the same as the  polymeric modifier required by                           
                 the present invention.  Thus, contrary to Appellants’ position, a person of                        
                 ordinary skill in the art would have reasonably expected that a modifier,                          

                                                        17                                                          





Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007