Appeal No. 2004-2292
Application No. 09/747,537
We affirm all of the Examiner’s rejections: (I)The rejection of claims
1-7, 9, 10, 13-18, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) over the combined
teachings of Schloegl and Blemberg; (II) The rejection of claim 12 under 35
U.S.C. 103(a) over the combined teachings of Schloegl, Blemberg and
Arita; (III) The rejection of claims 1-7, 9, 10, 13-18, 29, and 30 under 35 U.S.C.
103(a) over the combined teachings of Schloegl and Keller; (IV) The
rejection of claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) over the combination of
Schloegl, Keller and Arita; (V) The rejection of claims l-7, 9, 10, 13-28, 30, 33,
35, 37, and 38 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) over the combined teachings of
Peiffer and Blemberg; (VI) The rejection of claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a)
over the combined teachings of Peiffer, Blemberg and Arita; (VII) The
rejection of claims 1-7, 9, 10, 13-30, 33, 35, 37, and 38 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a)
over the combined teachings of Peiffer and Keller; and (VII) The rejection
of claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) over the combined teachings of Peiffer,
Keller and Arita.
21
Page: Previous 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007