The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JEAN-MICHEL STURLA,
JEAN-LUC BREMENSON, FRANCOIS LE BOURHIS,
and ARNAUD VILBERT
__________
Appeal No. 2004-2322
Application No. 09/385,412
__________
HEARD: January 25, 2005
__________
Before ELLIS, ADAMS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-29, all of the claims remaining. Claim 1 is representative and reads
as follows:
1. An aerosol device comprising:
(a) a container containing a composition formed of a fluid and at least one
propellant, and
(b) means for distributing the composition,
wherein:
(i) the composition comprises, in a cosmetically acceptable medium, at
least one polycondensate comprising at least one sequence chosen from polyurethanes
and polyureas, and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007