Ex Parte Mehrotra et al - Page 11



         Appeal No. 2005-0239                                                       
         Application No. 10/145,421                                                 

         pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b) (effective September 13, 2004, 69            
         Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21           
         (September 7, 2004)).  37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground          
         of rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered            
         final for judicial review."                                                
              37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN           
         TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of             
         the following two options with respect to the new ground of                
         rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the rejected            
         claims:                                                                    
                   (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate                   
              amendment of the claims so rejected or new evidence                   
              relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and have                 
              the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event               
              the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                
                   (2) Request rehearing.  Request that the                         
              proceeding be reheard under § 41.52 by the Board upon                 
              the same record. . . .                                                
              Should the appellants elect to prosecute further before the           
         examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b)(1), in order to preserve            
         the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or 145 with                
         respect to the affirmed rejection, the effective date of the               
         affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the prosecution before          
         the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited                     
         prosecution, the affirmed rejection is overcome.                           
                                         11                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007