Ex Parte Moon et al - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 2005-0247                                                                                  Page 3                     
                 Application No. 10/171,657                                                                                                       


                                  a nozzle plate having said plurality of nozzles disposed therein, said                                          
                         nozzle plate being placed on a substrate to form a cavity underneath said                                                
                         nozzle plate, said cavity being in fluid communication with each of said                                                 
                         plurality of nozzles to provide a supply of ink thereto; and                                                             
                                  a plurality of heating elements, each of said heating elements                                                  
                         having a first portion that has a first resistance and a second portion that                                             
                         has a second resistance different from said first resistance, each of said                                               
                         heating elements generating an annular bubble with balanced distribution                                                 
                         within said cavity, said annular bubbles each having a virtual chamber                                                   
                         formed within the corresponding annular bubbles and ink present in the                                                   
                         virtual chamber is ejected through a corresponding one of said nozzles.                                                  


                         Claims 1, 6, 7, 9,11-19, 24, 25, and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                                          
                 as obvious over U.S. Patent No. 4,870,433 ("Campbell").  Claims 2-5, 8, 20, 23, and 26                                           
                 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Campbell and U.S. Patent No. 4,914,562                                             
                 ("Abe").  Claim 10 stands rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Campbell and U.S.                                              
                 Patent No. 5,305,018 ("Schantz").                                                                                                


                                                                  OPINION                                                                         
                         Our opinion addresses the claims in the following order:                                                                 
                         •        claims 1, 6, 7, 9,11-19, 24, 25, and 27                                                                         
                         •        claims 2-5, 8, 10, 20, 23, and 26.                                                                              













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007