Ex Parte Chwalek et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0284                                                        
          Application No. 10/035,902                                                  

               a controller adapted to selectively switch the mechanism               
          between its first and its second states such that ink droplets of           
          said predetermined large volume are not simultaneously emitted              
          from adjacent ones of said nozzles.                                         
          2.   An ink jet printer as set forth in Claim 1, wherein the                
          nozzle array is linear.                                                     
               The examiner relies upon the following reference in the                
          rejection of the appealed claims:                                           
          Hawkins et al. (Hawkins)        6,457,807 B1         Oct. 1, 2002           
                                                      (filed Feb. 16, 2001)           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an inkjet                 
          printer comprising a print head having an array of nozzles which            
          emit ink droplets.  The printer also comprises a mechanism that             
          adjusts the volume of the droplets to either a first state of               
          small volume or a second state of large volume.  In addition, the           
          printer comprises a controller that can selectively switch the              
          mechanism between its first and second states in order that ink             
          droplets of a large volume are not simultaneously emitted from              
          adjacent nozzles.                                                           
               Appealed claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)            
          as being anticipated by Hawkins.                                            
               In accordance with the grouping of claims set forth at                 
          page 2 of appellants' Brief, claims 1 and 3-8 stand or fall                 
          together, whereas claim 2 is argued separately.                             

                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007