Ex Parte Cantell et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0293                                                        
          Application No. 09/727,139                                                  


          dimensions...”  (Appeal brief filed on Jun. 3, 2003, paper 12,              
          page 3.)  Further details of this appealed subject matter are               
          recited in representative claim 1, the sole independent claim on            
          appeal, reproduced below:                                                   
                    1.  A method of fabricating a line comprising:                    
                    (a) providing a substrate having a hard mask                      
                         material on the substrate;                                   
                    (b) patterning the hard mask material to provide                  
                         a line segment, the line segment having a                    
                         first dimension measured across the line                     
                         segment;                                                     
                    (c) reacting a surface layer of the line segment                  
                         by vapor phase etching to form a layer of a                  
                         reaction product on sidewalls of the line                    
                         segment;                                                     
                    (d) removing the reaction product without                         
                         attacking the remaining portion of the line                  
                         segment and without attacking the substrate                  
                         to form the line segment with a dimension                    
                         across the line segment that is smaller than                 
                         the first dimension.                                         
               The examiner relies on the following prior art references              
          as evidence of unpatentability:                                             
          Jeng et al.             5,282,925           Feb. 01, 1994                  
               (Jeng)                                                                 
          Then et al.             5,569,355           Oct. 29, 1996                  
               (Then)                                                                 
          Ramachandran et al.      5,980,770           Nov. 09, 1999                  
               (Ramachandran)                                                         



                                          2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007