Ex Parte Fuchs - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Ex parte ERICH FUCHS                                  
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2005-0960                                  
                             Application No. 10/053,166                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GARRIS and JEFFREY T. SMITH,                       
          Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-8              
          and 11.                                                                     
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a rubber mixture               
          comprising carboxylated nitrile rubbers, metal salts of an                  
          acrylate, liquid acrylates and silanes.  This appealed subject              
          matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which               
          reads as follows:                                                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007