Ex Parte Alvite et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2005-1331                                                                       4               
              Application No. 10/215,414                                                                                 


                     In rejecting claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 9 through 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22 and 24 under 35                
              U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Yoshio in view of Balboni, the examiner has                     
              found that Yoshio discloses a warming blanket comprising a fabric (1), first and second                    
              heating elements (2 and 4, respectively), and a single controller (5) for cycling power                    
              individually and alternatively between the heating elements with a fixed duty cycle ratio.                 
              In the examiner’s view, the claimed warming fabric differs from the warming blanket of                     
              Yoshio by calling for first and second non-overlapping zones to be adjacent the lower                      
              and upper portions of the user respectively, and providing more power to the first                         
              heating element compared to the second heating element.  To account for these                              
              differences, the examiner points to Balboni and makes the determination that,                              
                     Providing selectively-activated heaters with different power ratings in a                           
                     flexible heating pad is conventional and well known in the art as evidenced                         
                     by Balboni (US4162393) noting heaters 14, 20, and 24 that heat                                      
                     respective zones and activated selectively.  The zones correspond to the                            
                     head, torso, and feet.  See Fig. 5.  Heater 14 is 30W and heaters 20 and                            
                     24 are 60W respectively.  See col. 1, line 62 - col. 2, line 3.  Such an                            
                     arrangement ensures that different heating intensities are applied to                               
                     different parts of the body, thus reducing the heating intensity for those                          
                     parts of the body that do not cool as fast as others (e.g., the head).  In                          
                     view of Balboni (US4162393), it would have been obvious to one of                                   
                     ordinary skill in the art to (1) provide longitudinally separate heating zones,                     
                     and (2) provide different heating powers corresponding to those zones in                            
                     JP6-132069 so that different parts of the body were heated differently to                           
                     compensate for the diverse cooling rates along the body (answer, page 4).                           
                     For the reasons adequately set forth by appellants in their brief (pages 6-11) and                  
              reply brief, we find that the examiner’s proposed modification of the particular form of                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007