Ex Parte Alvite et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2005-1331                                                                       7               
              Application No. 10/215,414                                                                                 


              the fabric and configured to heat a second zone of the fabric (head end) adjacent an                       
              upper portion of the user, and a single multiplex controller (5) for cycling power                         
              individually and alternatively between the heating elements (2) and (4).  The first (foot                  
              end) zone and second (head end) zone of the blanket in Yoshio are clearly separated                        
              from one another and do not substantially overlap.  From our reading, it appears that                      
              claims 1 and 16 on appeal do not preclude an arrangement like that shown in Yoshio                         
              wherein the first and second heating elements each also heat additional “zones” of the                     
              electric blanket.  In that regard, we observe that claims 1 and 16 on appeal do not                        
              mandate that each zone of the fabric therein be heated by only one heating element.                        


















                                            REVERSED AND REMANDED                                                        








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007