Ex Parte Weismiller et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-1471                                                                Page 2                
              Application No. 10/028,833                                                                                



                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellants' invention relates to a hospital bed (title).  A copy of the                        
              dependent claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                      
              Claim 38, the only independent claim on appeal, reads as follows:                                         
                            A bed comprising:                                                                           
                            a frame;                                                                                    
                            a deck supported by the frame;                                                              
                            a patient support surface supported by the deck;                                            
                            a siderail coupled to one of the frame and the deck, the siderail being                     
                     configured to move between a raised position in which at least a portion of the                    
                     siderail extends above the patient support surface and a lowered position in                       
                     which the siderail is positioned below the patient support surface;                                
                            a display screen coupled to the siderail, and                                               
                            a processor in communication with the display screen, the processor                         
                     being configured to provide variable graphical information to the display screen.                  


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Mitchell                                  4,612,679                   Sep. 23, 1986                       
              Marra, Jr. (Marra)                        5,097,550                   Mar. 24, 1992                       
              Williams et al. (Williams)                5,542,138                   Aug. 6, 1996                        


                     Claims 38 and 65 to 69 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                               
              unpatentable over Marra in view of Williams.                                                              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007