Ex Parte Weismiller et al - Page 13




                  Appeal No. 2005-1471                                                                                      Page 13                       
                  Application No. 10/028,833                                                                                                              



                           For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 38                                               
                  and claims 40 to 44, 65, 68, and 69 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                   
                  unpatentable over Marra in view of Williams is reversed.                                                                                


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 38, 40 to 44 and 65                                                
                  to 69 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                                
                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              





                                             CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                  )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )         APPEALS                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )              AND                                     
                                                                                                   )   INTERFERENCES                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JENNIFER D. BAHR                                      )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007