Ex Parte Hinds et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                           ___________                                               
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                     
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                           ___________                                               
                   Ex parte TERENCE MARTIN HINDS, JOHN JOSEPH GERAGHTY,                              
                                         and ROLF BASLER                                             
                                           ____________                                              
                                      Appeal No. 2005-1635                                           
                                   Application No. 09/782,036                                        
                                          _____________                                              
                                             ON BRIEF                                                
                                          _____________                                              

           Before KIMLIN, PAK and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent                            
           Judges.                                                                                   
           PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                 This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S. C. § 134 from                         
           the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 5, 8, 10                                 
           through 23 and 25 through 32, which are all of the claims                                 
           pending in the above-identified application.  These claims were                           
           amended subsequent to the final Office action dated November 04,                          
           2003.                                                                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007