The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL B. KOENEMAN
and
MARK A. TRAUTMAN
____________
Appeal No. 2005-2353
Application No. 10/028,860
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 to
7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29. Claims 8 to 11, 17 to 20 and 22 to 26 have been allowed.
Claim 3 has been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. Claim 21 has
been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007