onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Koeneman et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2005 > Ex Parte Koeneman et al - Page 1

Sponsored Links




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written        
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                               ____________                                                 

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                ____________                                                
                                        Ex parte PAUL B. KOENEMAN                                           
                                                     and                                                    
                                            MARK A. TRAUTMAN                                                
                                                ____________                                                
                                            Appeal No. 2005-2353                                            
                                          Application No. 10/028,860                                        
                                                ____________                                                
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                  
                                                ____________                                                
            Before McQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
            NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              



                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 to    
            7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29.  Claims 8 to 11, 17 to 20 and 22 to 26 have been allowed.             
            Claim 3 has been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim.  Claim 21 has               
            been canceled.                                                                                  


                   We REVERSE.                                                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007