Ex Parte Koeneman et al - Page 5




               Appeal No. 2005-2353                                                                           Page 5                   
               Application No. 10/028,860                                                                                              



               semiconductor element.  In this regard, it is possible that the solder connection between                               
               the semiconductor element and the underlying substrate would prevent the cooling fluid                                  
               from directly contacting and moving laterally across the bottom surface of the                                          
               semiconductor element.  As such, claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29 are not                                       
               anticipated by Fujisaki.                                                                                                


                       For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1,                               
               2, 6, 7, 12 to 16 and 27 to 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                                                    


               The obviousness rejections                                                                                              
                       We have also reviewed the references to Patel and Lin additionally applied in the                               
               rejection of claims 4 and 5 but find nothing therein which makes up for the deficiency of                               
               Fujisaki discussed above.  Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4                                 
               and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007