The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 145
Filed by: Merits Panel
Interference Trial Section
Mail Stop Interference Filed
P. O. Box 1450 May 4, 2005
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797
Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
SYDNEY GEORGE CHAPMAN and JULIAN HAMILTON JONES
Junior Party,
(Patent 6,216,228)
v.
GEOFFREY B. RHOADS
Senior Party.
(Application 10/118,849)
______________________
Interference No.105,209
______________________
Before: LEE, MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT - MERITS - Bd. R. 125(a)
(Revised Judgment)
The Judgment (Paper No. 144) is vacated. The Judgment itself did not identify those
claims found unpatentable in the Decision on Preliminary Motions (Interference No. 105,209,
Paper No. 143). This Revised Judgment specifically identifies that Chapman claims 1-11 were
held unpatentable in the Decision on Preliminary Motions as well as based on priority.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007