Ex Parte Rosenberg et al - Page 21



             Appeal No. 2005-0642                                                                               
             Application No. 09/568,278                                                                         

                                                      (3)                                                       
                                                In re Clement                                                   
                   The Federal Circuit’s opinion in Clement discusses a three-step test for                     
             analyzing recapture.                                                                               
                   Step 1 involves a determination of whether and in what aspect any claims                     
             sought to be reissued are broader than the patent claims.  The Federal Circuit                     
             reasoned that a reissue application claim deleting a limitation or element from a                  
             patent claim is broader as to that limitation’s or element’s aspect.  131 F.3d at                  
             1468, 45 USPQ2d at 1164.                                                                           
                   Step 2 involves a determination of whether the broader aspects of the reissue                
             application claims relate to surrendered subject matter.  131 F.3d at 1468-69,                     
             45 USPQ2d at 1164.  In this respect, review of arguments and/or amendments                         
             during the prosecution history of the application, which matured into the patent                   
             sought to be reissued, is appropriate.  In reviewing the prosecution history, the                  
             Federal Circuit observed that “[d]eliberately canceling or amending a claim in an                  
             effort to overcome a [prior art] reference strongly suggests that the applicant                    
             admits that the scope of the claim before cancellation or amendment is                             
             unpatentable.  131 F.3d at 1469, 45 USPQ2d at 1164.                                                

                                                     - 21 -                                                     




Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007