Ex Parte Anderson et al - Page 11


                     Appeal No.  2006-0102                                                                       Page 11                       
                     Application No.  09/732,439                                                                                               
                             When faced with circumstances similar to those at issue here, our                                                 
                     appellate reviewing court has held claims to lack adequate description.  For                                              
                     example, in University of California v. Eli Lilly and Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 43                                              
                     USPQ2d 1398 (Fed. Cir. 1997), our appellate reviewing court held that claims                                              
                     generically reciting cDNA encoding vertebrate or mammalian insulin were not                                               
                     adequately described by the disclosure of cDNA encoding rat insulin.  Id. at                                              
                     1568, 43 USPQ2d at 1406.  The court held that                                                                             
                             a generic statement such as “vertebrate insulin cDNA” or                                                          
                             “mammalian insulin cDNA,” without more, is not an adequate                                                        
                             written description of the genus because it does not distinguish the                                              
                             claimed genus from others, except by function.  It does not                                                       
                             specifically define any of the genes that fall within its definition.  It                                         
                             does not define any structural features commonly possessed by                                                     
                             members of the genus that distinguish them from others.  One                                                      
                             skilled in the art therefore cannot, as one can do with a fully                                                   
                             described genus, visualize or recognize the identity of the members                                               
                             of the genus.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                              
                     Id.  The court described two ways of properly describing a claimed genus:                                                 
                             A description of a genus of cDNAs may be achieved by means of a                                                   
                             recitation of a representative number of cDNAs, defined by                                                        
                             nucleotide sequence, falling within the scope of the genus or of a                                                
                             recitation of structural features common to the members of the                                                    
                             genus, which features constitute a substantial portion of the genus.                                              
                     Id.  The court has since clarified that the description of representative species                                         
                     does not necessarily have to include their complete structure (nucleotide                                                 
                     sequence).  See Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc., 323 F.3d 956, 964, 63                                               
                     USPQ2d 1609, 1613 (Fed. Cir. 2002).                                                                                       
                             The Eli Lilly court held that a fully described genus is one for which a                                          
                     person skilled in the art can “visualize or recognize the identity of the members of                                      
                     the genus.”  On this record, as the examiner points out (Answer, page 16),                                                






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007