Ex Parte Anderson et al - Page 8


                     Appeal No.  2006-0102                                                                        Page 8                       
                     Application No.  09/732,439                                                                                               
                             2. Hu, for a disclosure of a “soybean homologue” of Δ1-pyrroline-5-                                               
                                 carboxylate synthetase (P5CS); however, Hu discloses only the                                                 
                                 mothbean PSC (see the abstact).                                                                               
                             3.  Verbruggen1.                                                                                                  
                             4. Dougherty, for a disclosure of human pyrroline-5-carboxylate                                                   
                                 reductase (P5CR).                                                                                             
                             5. Brandriss, for a disclosure of yeast Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate                                                
                                 synthetase (P5CS).                                                                                            
                             6.  Williamson2.                                                                                                  
                     Based on the foregoing, appellants assert (Brief, page 5), since “these                                                   
                     sequences were known to those of skill in the art at the time of filing, [a]ppellants                                     
                     cannot be said to lack written description for these sequences.”                                                          
                             In response, the examiner asserts (Answer, page 15), “[t]hat some genes                                           
                     encoding enzymes involved in proline biosynthesis were known in the art at the                                            
                     time of filing does not demonstrate that [a]ppellants were in full possession of the                                      
                     claimed genus. . . .”  More specifically, the examiner finds (Answer, bridging                                            
                     paragraph, pages 16-17) that knowledge in the art of two enzymes involved in                                              
                     proline biosynthesis (1) Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase from mothbean                                              
                     (Verma and Hu), and (2) human (Dougherty) and yeast (Brandriss) pyrroline-5-                                              
                     carboxylate reductase are not sufficient to represent the entire                                                          
                                                                                                                                               
                     1 Verbruggen et al. (Verbruggen), “Osmoregulation of a pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase gene in                          
                     Arabidopsis thaliana,” Plant Physiol., Vol. 103, No. 3, pages 771-781 (1993).  According to the                           
                     examiner (Answer, page 17), Verbruggen published November 1993, after appellants’ August 25,                              
                     1993 effective filing date, and therefore cannot be relied upon in support of appellants’ claimed                         
                     invention.  Accordingly, we have not considered appellants’ arguments with regard to this                                 
                     reference.                                                                                                                
                     2 Williamson et al. (Williamson), “Molecular Cloning and Evidence for Osmoregulation of the Δ1-                           
                     Pyrroline-5-Carboxylate Reductase (proC) Gene in Pea (Pisum sativum L.),” Plant Physiol., Vol.                            
                     100, pp. 1464-1470 (1992).  According to the examiner (Answer, page 17), this reference was not                           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007