Ex Parte Bersuch et al - Page 15



          Appeal No. 2006-0132                                                       
          Application No. 09/946,627                                                 
          (Published German Patent Application)                                      
          Bersuch et al. (Bersuch), “Affordable Composite Structure for              
          Next Generation Fighters,” Lockheed Martin Corporation, Published          
          by Society for the Advancement of Material and Process                     
          Engineering with permission, pp. 1-11 (1998).                              
          Sheahen et al. (Sheahen), “Robust Composite Sandwich Structures,”          
          Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems, Published by the                
          American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with             
          permission, pp. 1-12 (1998).                                               
          Owens et al. (Owens), “Tension Pull-off and Shear Test Methods to          
          Characterize 3-D Textile Reinforced Bonded Composite Tee-Joints,”          
          Composite Structures Theory and Practice, ASTM STP 1383, Editors           
          Grant et al., pp. 398-409 (2000).                                          
                                                                                    
          Wanthal et al. (Wanthal), “Interlaminar Reinforced Composite               
          Development for improved Damage Tolerance,” The Boeing Company,            
          Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Published by Society for                
          Advancement of Material and Process Engineering with permission,           
          pp. 1-15 (2000).                                                           
                                                                                    
                                     REJECTIONS                                      
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                        
          1) Claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 16 and 17 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as                
               unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Wanthal and             
               Campbell;                                                             
          2)  Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as unpatentable over the              
               combined disclosures of Wanthal, Campbell and at least                
               Childress and/or Boyce;                                               
          3) Claims 18 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as                        
               unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Wanthal,                
               Campbell, at least Berscuh, Sheahen and/or Owens and                  
               optionally Alston;                                                    
          4)  Claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as unpatentable over the             
               combined disclosures of Wanthal, Campbell and Barnes;                 
          5) Claims 27 and 28 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as unpatentable               
                                         15                                          




Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007