Ex Parte Hall et al - Page 4


             Appeal No. 2006-0375                                                                                     
             Application 10/447,581                                                                                   

             introducing new matter into the disclosure of the invention under 35 U.S.C. § 132, set forth in          
             the final action mailed December 20, 2004, is a petitionable matter.  Indeed, the examiner does          
             not find, and neither do we, that this amendatory material is necessary to support the scope of the      
             appealed claims and thus, the examiner’s objection is not tantamount to a ground of rejection of         
             the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, written description requirement.  See        
             Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 608.04(c) (8th ed., Rev. 2, May 2004, Rev. 3,              
             August 2005).                                                                                            





























                                                                                                                      
             (5th ed., Sybil P. Parker, ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1994).                                       

                                                         - 4 -                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007