Ex Parte Gonzalez et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0500                                                         
          Application No. 10/094,709                                                   

                    - said at least one layer of said composite is coated              
               with at least one protection layer made of a hardenable                 
               material selected from the following group consisting of                
               thermosetting resins, thermoplastic polymers, mixtures of               
               polymers, rigid foams, cements, and impregnated cloths                  
                    - said at least one protection layer is hardened before            
               polymerization and/or crosslinking of said at least one                 
               layer of said composite.                                                
               The prior art set forth below is relied upon by the examiner            
          as evidence of obviousness:                                                  
          Schetty et al. (Schetty)       3,884,269            May  20, 1975            
          Johansen et al. (Johansen)     3,988,188            Oct. 26, 1976            
          Nakasone et al. (Nakasone)     4,770,834            Sep. 13, 1988            
          Green et al. (Green)           5,445,191            Aug. 29, 1995            
          Werner & Pfleiderer            1,151,964            May  14, 1969            
          (published British patent application)(hereinafter referred to as            
          the British reference.)                                                      
          The admitted prior art disclosed at pages 1-5 of the subject                 
          specification and shown in figures 1A and 2A of the appellants’              
          drawing.                                                                     
               The following rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) are before            
          us in this appeal:                                                           
                    Claims 1-9 are rejected over Johansen in view of the               
               admitted prior art and Green, while claim 10 is                         
               correspondingly rejected over this prior art and further in             
               view of Schetty or the British reference;                               
                    Claims 14-19 are rejected over Johansen in view of the             
               admitted prior art, while claim 20 is correspondingly                   

                                          3                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007