Ex Parte RAMALEY et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2006-0653                                                        
          Application 09/211,337                                                      


          having a folder stored on said computer-readable medium, said               
          folder containing said at least one image, stylesheet or object             
          referenced in said file; and                                                
               performing a folder operation on the folder containing said            
          at least one image, stylesheet or object referenced in said file,           
          said folder operation corresponding to said file operation,                 
               wherein said folder operation is performed only on said                
          folder containing said at least one image, stylesheet or object             
          referenced in said file.                                                    
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
               Chang et al. (Chang)     6,081,806           Jun. 27, 2000             
          (Filed Jan. 15, 1998)                                                       
               Carter et al. (Carter)  WO98/22881           May  28, 1998             
          [Mangosoft]                                                                 
               Lehto, Kerry et al., Introducing Microsoft FrontPage97                 
          (Microsoft Press: 1997) pages 226-229                                       
               All claims on appeal, claims 1 through 12, 21, 22, and 24              
          through 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As to claims 1            
          through 12, 21, 22, 36 and 37, the examiner relies upon                     
          Carter/Mangosoft in view of Chang, with the addition of Lehto as            
          to claims 24 through 35.                                                    
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the             
          examiner, reference is made to the brief (no reply brief has been           
          filed) for appellants’ positions, and to the answer for the                 
          examiner’s positions.                                                       









                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007