Ex Parte de Paoli Ambrosi - Page 5


                   Appeal No.  2006-0729                                                                Page 5                    
                   Application No.  10/322,566                                                                                    
                   triglycerides.  Specification, page 4, lines 1-5.  In addition, and in contrast to the                         
                   hydrolysis of sebum triglycerides, the hydrolysis of ethyllinoleate and                                        
                   triethylcitrate results in the reduction of inflammatory pathologies associated with                           
                   seborrhea and acne.  Specification, page 4, lines 20-23.                                                       
                          Therefore, as we understand it, an additive that would affect the basic and                             
                   novel properties of the claimed composition would interfere with the hydrolysis, or                            
                   the effect2 of the hydrolysis, of ethyllinoleate and triethylcitrate.  Reading                                 
                   appellant’s disclosure, one class of compounds that would affect the basic and                                 
                   novel properties of the claimed composition would be triglycerides, which are                                  
                   normally found in sebum and upon hydrolysis cause skin irritation and                                          
                   inflammation.  See e.g., Specification, page 4, lines 1-5 and 20-23, and Brief,                                
                   page 22.  While the examiner has asserted that the “additives” set forth in claim                              
                   18 and 22 may affect the basic and novel properties of appellant’s claimed                                     
                   composition, the examiner provides no evidence to support this assertion.  In                                  
                   addition, we note that appellant has provided evidence (see Brief, pages 10-22,                                
                   and Evidence Appendix) that the compounds listed in claims 18 and 22 are                                       
                   known to be used topically “for treating and improving the aesthetic condition of                              
                   skin.”                                                                                                         
                          On reflection, we find the weight of the evidence falls with appellant.                                 
                   Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 18 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                               
                   second paragraph.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                 

                                                                                                                                  
                   2 The reduction of inflammatory pathologies associated with seborrhea and acne.                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007