Ex Parte Karidis et al - Page 1




                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not        
                                                    binding precedent of the Board.                                                


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                                  Ex parte DARRIN BENZER                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                                     Appeal No.   2006-1881                                                        
                                                  Application No. 10/145,408                                                       
                                                         ____________                                                              
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                         ____________                                                              
                   Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                   THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                          Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims                        
                   1 through 7, 9, 10, 14 through 25 and 28 through 50, appellant having canceled claims 8,                        
                   11 through 13, 26 and 27.                                                                                       
                          Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                  
                          1. A clamping circuit comprising a comparator device for detecting when at least                         
                              one voltage passes at least one voltage level and an output driver circuit                           
                              comprising at least one low voltage output driver device, at least said output                       
                              driver device coupled to at least a bi-directional Pad providing both input and                      
                              output.                                                                                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007