Ex Parte Lal et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                 __________                                                   
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                 __________                                                   
                                   Ex parte PREETI LAL, NEIL C. CORLEY,                                       
                              KARL J. GUEGLER, and CHANDRA PATTERSON                                          
                                                 __________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2006-1035                                              
                                          Application No. 09/925,140                                          
                                                 __________                                                   
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                 __________                                                   
            Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
            GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This appeal involves claims to a polynucleotide encoding, among other things, a            
            “naturally occurring amino acid sequence at least 90% identical” to SEQ ID NO:1.  The             
            examiner has rejected the claims as nonenabled and lacking adequate written                       
            description.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.  We affirm both rejections.             
                                                 Background                                                   
                   “Serine dehydratase (SDH) is an enzyme involved in gluconeogenesis, the                    
            formation of glucose . . . from amino acids and certain types of fat. . . .  SDH converts         
            serine to pyruvate and NH4+. . . .  A variety of SDHs have been observed in organisms             
            ranging from bacteria to vertebrates.  A motif which interacts with SDH’s pyridoxal               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007