Ex Parte Lal et al - Page 3


               Appeal No. 2006-1035                                                                           Page 3                   
               Application No. 09/925,140                                                                                              

                       The rejections on appeal focus on part (b) of the claim:  polynucleotides encoding                              
               “a polypeptide comprising a naturally occurring amino acid sequence at least 90%                                        
               identical to the amino acid [sequence] of SEQ ID NO:1.”                                                                 
               2.  Enablement                                                                                                          
                       The examiner rejected claims 3-7, 9, 11, and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                                    
               paragraph, on the basis that the specification does not provide an enabling disclosure                                  
               with respect to polynucleotides encoding an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical                                  
               to SEQ ID NO:1.  See the Examiner’s Answer, pages 3-4.  The examiner noted that                                         
               claim 3 is not limited to polynucleotides encoding polypeptides that have the activity                                  
               disclosed in the specification for SEQ ID NO:1.  Id., page 4.                                                           
                       The examiner reasoned that “even a small difference between sequences could                                     
               render substantial differences between the activities of the proteins.”  Id., page 5.  As                               
               supporting evidence, the examiner cited:                                                                                
                       • Burgess,1 as teaching that “the replacement of a single lysine at position 118                                
                           of the acidic fibroblast growth factor by a glutamic acid led to a substantial                              
                           loss of . . . biological activity”;                                                                         
                       • Lazar,2 as teaching that the activity of TGF-α was not affected by replacing                                  
                           the aspartic acid at position 47 with asparagine, but replacing it with serine or                           
                           glutamic acid sharply reduced biological activity;                                                          
                       • Schwartz,3 as teaching that “[r]eplacement of the histidine at position 10 of                                 
                           the B-chain of human insulin with aspartic acid converts the molecule into a                                
                           superagonist”; and                                                                                          

                                                                                                                                       
               1 Burgess et al., “Possible dissociation of the heparin-binding and mitogenic activities of heparin-binding             
               (acidic fibroblast) growth factor-1 from its receptor-binding activities by site-directed mutagenesis of a              
               single lysine residue,” Journal of Cell Biology, Vol. 111, pp. 2129-2138 (1990)                                         
               2 Lazar et al., “Transforming growth factor α: Mutation of aspartic acid 47 and leucine 48 results in                   
               different biological activities,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, Vol. 8, pp. 1247-1252 (1988)                          
               3 Schwartz et al., “A superactive insulin: [B10-Aspartic acid]insulin (human),” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,             
               Vol. 84, pp. 6408-6411 (1987)                                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007