Appeal No. 2006-1134
Application No. 10/002,438
U.S. 1, 17, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966), and to provide a reason why
one having ordinary skill in the pertinent art would have been
led to modify the prior art or to combine prior art references to
arrive at the claimed invention. See also In re Rouffet, 149
F.3d 1350, 1355, 47 USPQ2d 1453, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
From our review of Brisebois and Littlefield, we find that
the references are both concerned with displaying Web pages and
search results that include tags to items on the corresponding
Web page. Brisebois uses different ways of referring to a
particular portion of the displayed page by including in the
bookmark directory additional fields related to the user
identified section of the Web page (col. 6, lines 13-27).
Figures 3A-3F depict the bookmark records that include additional
fields for identifying the desired portion such as the page
coordinates, dimensions of the window to be displayed and scroll
bar positions (col. 4, line 53 through col. 6, line 27).
Littlefield, similarly pertains to displaying non-default items,
such as graphics, in a search result page by embedding tags to
such items in the Web page (col. 5, lines 49-51). Littlefield
further describes the font attributes as the information stored
within the search result Web page so that those non-default
attributes are displayed (col. 5, lines 51-59).
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007