Appeal No. 2006-1176
Application No. 09/926,202
Thus, having considered the totality of record, including
due consideration of all of the arguments proffered by both the
examiner and the appellant, we determine that the examiner has
established a prima facie case of obviousness, which has not
been sufficiently rebutted by the appellant. Accordingly, we
affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 6 through 21
under Section 103(a).
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, we affirm the examiner’s decision
rejecting all of the claims on appeal under Section 103(a).
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHUNG K. PAK ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CKP:TF
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007