Ex Parte Raaijmakers et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          



                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                        

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                 Ex parte CHRISTOPHE F. L. POMAREDE,                                                    
                     CORNELIUS A. VAN DER JEUGD,                                          ALEXANDER                     
                             GSCHWANDTNER                             and ANDRES GRASSI                                 
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2006-1333                                                   
                                               Application No. 10/347,849                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                         HEARD                                                          
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
              RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                    



                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 24-32.  Claims 1-              
              23 and 33-40 have been canceled.  An amendment filed May 19, 2004 after final rejection                   
              has been approved for entry by the Examiner.                                                              




                     The disclosed invention relates to a method of forming an integrated circuit that                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007