Ex Parte Schneider et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was           
           not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding          
                              precedent of the Board.                               

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    ────────────                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    ────────────                                    
                            Ex parte JOHN H. SCHNEIDER,                             
                                 DONALD L. CREVIER,                                 
                                  STEVEN AUSNIT,                                    
                                  MICHAEL MCMAHON,                                  
                                  LAWRENCE SHARE,                                   
                                 ERIC P. PLOURDE and                                
                                  ROBERT E. HOGAN                                   
                                    ────────────                                    
                                Appeal No. 2006-1354                                
                            Application No. 10/337,026                              
                                    ────────────                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ────────────                                    
         Before GARRIS, FRANKLIN and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.           
         GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final                
         rejection of claims 10, 11, 13 and 15.  We AFFIRM.                         
              Independent claim 10 is representative of the subject                 
         matter on appeal and is set forth below:                                   
              A reclosable package having a top, bottom, and sides,                 
              said package comprising:                                              
              a first wall and a second wall opposite to said first                 
              wall;                                                                 
              a first zipper profile having a first interlocking                    
              member and a first flange portion, said first flange                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007