Ex Parte Schneider et al - Page 13



         Appeal No. 2006-1354                                                       
         Application No. 10/337,026                                                 

                                     CONCLUSION                                     
              The examiner’s rejection of claims 10, 11 and 13 under                
         35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Wiley is reversed.           
              The examiner’s rejection of claims 10 and 11 under                    
         35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being unpatentable over Malin is reversed.           
              The examiner’s rejection of claims 10 and 11 under                    
         35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being unpatentable over Strand is                    
         affirmed.                                                                  
              The examiner’s rejection of claims 13 and 15 under                    
         35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Strand is                    
         affirmed.                                                                  
              Since all claims under appeal are subject to a sustained              
         rejection, the decision of the Examiner rejecting all appealed             
         claims is affirmed.                                                        










                                        -13-                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007