Ex Parte OHTANI et al - Page 2


                   Appeal Number:  2006-1372                                                                                      
                   Application Number:  09/197,767                                                                                

                          1.  A semiconductor device comprising:                                                                  
                          at least one transistor;                                                                                
                          at least one interlayer insulating film formed over said transistor, said interlayer                    
                   insulating film having at least one contact hole;                                                              
                          an embedded conductive layer provided to fill said contact hole wherein a top                           
                   surface of said embedded conductive layer is flush with a top surface of said interlayer                       
                   insulating film; and                                                                                           
                          a reflective pixel electrode having a flat upper surface thereon, formed on said                        
                   interlayer insulating film wherein said reflective pixel electrode is electrically connected                   
                   to said transistor through said embedded conductive layer,                                                     
                          wherein the embedded conductive layer comprises a conductive material                                   
                   dispersed in a medium, the conductive material being selected from the group consisting                        
                   of carbon, zinc oxide, aluminum, and nickel.                                                                   
                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                         
                   appealed claims are:                                                                                           
                   Liu    5,536,950   Jul. 16, 1996                                                                               
                   Miyawaki   5,644,370   Jul. 01, 1997                                                                           
                   Fukunaga   5,706,064   Jan. 06, 1998                                                                           
                   Yamazaki   5,990,542   Nov. 23, 1999 (Dec. 16, 1996)                                                           
                   Sato    6,081,305   Jun. 27, 2000  (May 21, 1996)                                                              
                   Okita    6,097,453   Aug. 01, 2000 (Jun. 02, 1997)                                                             
                   Izumi    6,400,428   Jun. 04, 2002  (Mar. 20, 1996)                                                            
                          Claims 1, 5, 16, 22 through 27, 40, 46, 47, 51, 55, 59, 63, 67, 68, 71, and 72 stand                    
                   rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Liu in view of Fukunaga and                          
                   Izumi.                                                                                                         
                          Claims 2, 22 through 27, 40, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
                   § 103 as being unpatentable over Liu in view of Yamazaki, Fukunaga, and Izumi.                                 
                          Claims 3, 22 through 27, 40, 49, 53, 57, 61, 65, 69, 70, 73, and 74 stand rejected                      
                   under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sato in view of Okita, Fukunaga, and                          
                   Miyawaki.                                                                                                      
                          Claims 4 and 50 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                         
                   Sato in view of Okita, Miyawaki, and Yamazaki.                                                                 


                                                                2                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007