Appeal No. 2006-1413 Page 10
Application No. 09/952,073
1. Claim Construction
Claim 1 further recites in pertinent part the following limitations: "prompting said
user to answer a plurality of questions; generating corresponding provisioning
information for said network communication device within said electronic device based
on answers given by said user in response to said plurality of questions. . . ." Giving the
representative claim its broadest, reasonable construction, the limitations require basing
provisioning information on answers.
2. Obviousness Determination
As aforementioned, the appellants admit that Jaalinoja generates a token based
on a request. (App. Br. at 5.) Because such a token is used for the provision of VIP
services, customer benefit services, or payable services, as mentioned regarding the
first point of contention, we find that a user must answer questions regarding which of
such services he desires and that the provisioning information of the token must be
based on these answers. Similarly, because the information stored on DiGiorgio's
secure token device can be used for the provision of access to the Internet, chat rooms,
news services, electronic mail messaging, and bulletin board services, as also
mentioned regarding the first point of contention, we find that a user must answer
questions regarding which of such services he desires and that the provisioning
information stores on the token must be based on these answers.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007