Ex Parte McGrath et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-1670                                                                        Page 2                
               Application No. 10/336,729                                                                                        


                                                       BACKGROUND                                                                
                      The appellants’ invention relates to bed clothing with means for facilitating the changing                 
               of an absorbent panel thereof (present specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is                
               set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                                                               
                      The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:                                     
               Fukuroi   US 4,015,457   Apr. 5, 1977                                                                             
               O’Connell   US 4,097,943   Jul. 4, 1978                                                                           
               Blake    US 5,086,530   Feb. 11, 1992                                                                             
               Ghanem   US 6,651,278 B2  Nov. 25, 2003 (Oct. 12, 2001)                                                           

                      The following rejections are before us for review.                                                         
                      Claims 27-52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject                  
               matter which was not described in the appellants’ specification so as to convey that the                          
               appellants had possession of the invention at the time the application was filed, i.e., failing to                
               comply with the written description requirement.                                                                  
                      Claims 27-29, 31, 34-47 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                         
               anticipated by Ghanem.                                                                                            
                      Claims 1, 2, 5, 8-10, 12-15, 17-21, 23-25, 27, 28, 31, 34-36, 38, 40, 41, 43-47 and 49-51                  
               stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blake in view of Ghanem.                          
                      Claims 1, 2, 5, 8-10, 12, 13, 16-21, 23-25, 27, 28, 31, 34-36, 38, 42-47 and 49-51 stand                   
               rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ghanem in view of Blake.                                
                      Claims 3 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blake                      
               in view of Ghanem or Ghanem in view of Blake, as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view                    
               of Fukuroi.                                                                                                       
                      Claims 11, 13, 37 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
               Blake in view of Ghanem or Ghanem in view of Blake, as applied to claim 1 above, and further                      
               in view of O’Connell.                                                                                             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007