Appeal No. 2006-1695
Application No. 10/649,277
placing each of the selected one of the plurality of
compressed, resultant images into a concatenation file; and
creating a look-up table corresponding to the concatenation
file by which each of the selected one of the plurality of
compressed, resultant images is retrievable from the
concatenation file.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Takagi 5,486,893 Jan. 23, 1996
Lee 5,635,984 Jun. 3, 1997
Kuchta et al.
(Kuchta) 5,164,831 Nov. 17, 1992
Higgins et al.
(Higgins) 5,835,627 Nov. 10, 1998
Takeda et al.
(Takeda) 5,343,560 Aug. 30, 1994
Kagle 6,148,149 Nov. 14, 2000
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1-3, 6, 7, 12-16, 19, 20, 28-30, 33, 34, and 39
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Takagi in view of Lee and further in view of Kuchta.
2. Claims 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 31, 32, 35,
36, and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Takagi in view of Lee, Kuchta, and further in
view of Kagle.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007