Ex Parte Mitra et al - Page 3



         Appeal No. 2006-1729                                                       
         Application No. 10/107,628                                                 
              22. A device comprising:                                              
                    a plurality of inputs;                                          
                    a plurality of outputs, the number of outputs being             
                    less than the number of inputs;                                 
                    exclusive OR gates coupled between certain of said              
                    inputs and certain of said outputs;                             
                    at least one exclusive OR gate coupled between each             
                    input and at least one output; and                              
                    each input being coupled to said outputs differently.           

                                     References                                     
         The Examiner relies on the following references:                           
         Hong               4,241,307                     Dec. 23, 1980            
         Rajski et al. (Rajski)       2003/0115521       Jun. 19, 2003              
         (filed Jan. 29, 2003)                                                      
         Ivanov et al. (Ivanov), Programmable Bist Space Compactors, IEEE           
         Transactions on Computers, Vol. 45, Issue 12, pp 1393-1404, Dec.           
         1996.                                                                      

                                 Rejections At Issue                                
         A.  Claims 1, 6, 11, 15, 22 and 26 stand rejected under 35                 
         U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Ivanov1.                              

                                                                                   
         1 We note that this reference qualifies as prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b)
         since it was published more than a year before the effective filing date of
         the present application.  Therefore, the Examiner should have rejected the 
         claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (b) instead.                                  
                                         3                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007