Ex Parte ELLIS et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1783                                                         
          Application No. 09/183,694                                                   
          threads of sequential commands that exist simultaneously.  An                
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of              
          exemplary independent claims 3, 21 and 26 which are reproduced as            
          follows:                                                                     
               3.  A data controller, that is couplable to a host and                  
          coupled to a storage medium, microprocessor, local storage and a             
          buffer memory, comprising a command queuing engine that creates a            
          plurality of threads of sequential commands that exist                       
          simultaneously while minimizing interrupts associated to the                 
          commands.                                                                    
               21.  A data controller of a peripheral device having a                  
          storage medium and a processor, wherein the data controller                  
          minimizes interrupts to the processor by re-ordering a plurality             
          of commands received from a host computer from an order of                   
          arrival into an order of sequence in the storage medium.                     
               26.  A peripheral device that includes a data controller, a             
          microprocessor, a buffer memory, local memory and a storage                  
          medium, and that is couplable to a host, wherein the data                    
          controller creates threads of a plurality of commands and                    
          generates interrupts at the beginning and end of the plurality of            
          commands relative to a data transfer.                                        
               The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting            
          the claims:                                                                  
          Bean et al. (Bean)            4,543,626            Sep. 24, 1985             
          Jones et al. (Jones)          5,483,641            Jan. 9, 1996              
          Krakirian                     5,781,803            Jul. 14, 1998             
               Claims 21, 22 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)            
          as being anticipated by Krakirian.                                           
               Claims 23-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Krakirian and Bean.                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007