Ex Parte Tsengas - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2006-2087                                                       
         Application No. 10/960,252                                                 

              dextrine of 10% by weight;                                            
              casein of 5.0% by weight;                                             
              dried fermentation solubles of 2% by weight;                          
              calcium carbonate at 2.0% by weight;                                  
         glycerine at 3.0% by weight;                                               
              colors and flavorings of the balance of the weight;                   
              wherein said rawhide-based product forms moldable dough               
              that can be cooked.                                                   
              The examiner relies upon the following references as                  
         evidence of obviousness:                                                   
         Balaz et al. (Balaz)         4,055,681              Oct. 25, 1977          
         Greene et al. (Greene)       4,419,372              Dec.  6, 1983          
         Lehn et al. (Lehn)           4,702,929              Oct. 27, 1987          
         Spanier et al. (Spanier)     5,532,010              Jul.  2, 1996          
         Denesuk et al. (Denesuk)     6,178,922              Jan. 30, 2001          
         Perlberg et al. (Perlberg)   6,223,693              May   1, 2001          
         Wang et al. (Wang)           6,379,725              Apr. 30, 2002          
         Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, p. 44 (1985).                   
              Appellant’s claimed invention is directed to a rawhide-based          
         product comprising ground rawhide, water, modified cornstarch,             
         dextrine, casein, calcium carbonate, glycerine and other                   
         ingredients, such as colorings and flavorings.  The claimed                
         product finds utility as a chew toy for animals.                           
              Appealed claims 1-3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
         as being unpatentable over Lehn and Denesuk in view of Perlberg,           

                                        -2-                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007