Appeal No. 2006-2116
Application No. 08/879,517
Langworthy, and Ambrosio as cumulative of the affirmed rejections,
at best.
Conclusion
Having considered the merits of the examiner’s rejection of
Claims 1-3, 26, 27, 37, 48-56 and 58-62 for unpatentability under
35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the prior art acknowledged in
appellant’s own U.S. Patent 5,425,294, Johnson, Langworthy, and
Ambrosio; and all the evidence of record for and against the
rejection, we affirm.
10 Having considered the merits of the examiner’s rejection of
Claims 1-3, 26, 27, 37, 48-56 and 58-62 for unpatentability under
35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the combined prior art teachings of
Ito, Johnson, Langworthy, and Ambrosio; and all the evidence of
record for and against the rejection, we affirm.
20
24
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007