Ex Parte Hudson et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-2159                                                                                 
                Application 09/862,234                                                                           

                room temperature, as required by the claims on appeal (Answer 5).                                
                Alternatively, if the resin and plasticizer mixture was not fluid at room                        
                temperature, the Examiner applies Sartor for the teaching that the most                          
                important factor in the art of multi-cavity slot die coating is the liquid’s                     
                viscosity or the ratio of viscosities of the two contiguous layers, and such                     
                viscosity can be changed by adding thickeners or thinners (Answer 5).  From                      
                these findings, the Examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to                        
                one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention “to have used only                 
                thinners such as liquid reactive monomers, e.g. dodecene, or water in                            
                Simpson et al without heating coating compositions” with the expectation of                      
                providing the desired optimal ratio of viscosities of the two contiguous                         
                layers to be coated, as taught by Sartor (id.).  We disagree.                                    
                       As correctly argued by Appellants (Br. 10-11), neither Simpson nor                        
                Sartor disclose or suggest the required limitation of claims 1 and 10 on                         
                appeal that the 100% solids composition is fluid at room temperature.  The                       
                Examiner’s technical reasoning is not convincing since the Examiner has not                      
                presented any factual basis to support the premise that the mixture of solid                     
                resin and liquid plasticizer (mineral oil) would necessarily be a fluid at room                  
                temperature.  To the contrary, the Kauffman Declaration under 37 C.F.R.                          
                § 1.132 dated Oct. 27, 2005, states that such mixtures result in non-fluid                       
                masses at room temperature (Decl. 2-3: ¶ 9).1  Furthermore, the process of                       
                Simpson clearly suggests that the mixture of resin and plasticizer is a melt,                    
                                                                                                                
                1 The Kauffman Declaration was submitted by Appellants with the Brief (Br.                       
                1).  The Examiner does not explicitly state that this Declaration was entered                    
                and considered but does respond to the evidence in the Declaration (Answer                       
                11).  Therefore, for the purposes of this appeal, we consider this Declaration                   
                as evidence of record, implicitly entered and considered by the Examiner.                        
                                                       5                                                         


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007