Ex Parte 5578684 et al - Page 1



        1           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
        2                                                                                                     
        3                                                                                                     
        4   Filed by:                                                                                         
        5   Trial Division Merits Panel                        Filed: 12 December 2006                       
        6   Madison East, Room 9D20                                                                           
        7   P.O. Box 1450                                                                                     
        8   Alexandria VA 22313-1450                                                                          
        9   Tel: 571-272-4683                                                                                 
        9 Fax: 571-273-0042                                                                                   
       10                                                                                                     
       11                                                                                                     
       12               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
       13                                    _______________                                                  
       14                                                                                                     
       15                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
       16                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
       17                                    _______________                                                  
       18                                                                                                     
       19                                   Ex parte BASF AG                                                  
       20                                    _______________                                                  
       21                                                                                                     
       22                                  Appeal No. 2006-2247                                               
       23                     Reexamination Nos. 90/006,554 and 90/006,894                                    
       24                            (of United States Patent 5,578,684)                                      
       25                                    _______________                                                  
       26                                                                                                     
       27                               HEARD: December 11, 2006                                              
       28                                    _______________                                                  
       29                                                                                                     
       30                                                                                                     
       31   Before DELMENDO, TIERNEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
       32                                                                                                     
       33   DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            
       34                                                                                                     
       35                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
       36                                                                                                     
       37          This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 306 (2006) from                 
       38   the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6 in the above-identified merged                       
       39   reexamination proceedings.  (Examiner’s Answer mailed September 1, 2005; final                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007