Ex Parte Arbab et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                       Ex parte MEHRAN ARBAB,                                                 
                                         JAMES M. BALDAUFF,                                                   
                                          DENNIS G. SMITH and                                                 
                                        GERALD DIGIAMPAOLO                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2690                                                 
                                           Application 10/101,242                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                       Decided:  September 29, 2006                                           
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final                       
                rejection of claims 34 through 50 and 52 through 54.  The only other claims                   
                pending in this application are claims 1 through 33, and these claims stand                   
                withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner as directed to a non-                    
                elected invention (Br. 2).  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007