Ex Parte Bollin et al - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2006-2789                                                                         
               Application No. 10/215,217                                                                   


               The disclosed invention pertains to an RJ45 plug connector.  The plug                        
               connector includes (1) a first plug connector part that receives an RJ45 female              
               plug therein, and (2) a second plug connector part that receives an adapter                  
               therein.  Two power contacts are arranged at the side of the adapter.  The                   
               connector provides mechanical strength and fluid and dust tightness and is                   
               therefore useful in factory environments.                                                    
                      Representative claim 8 is reproduced as follows:                                      
                      8.  A plug connector comprising a first plug connector part, a female plug            
               that is received in said first plug connector part, a second plug connector part             
               and an adapter that is received in said second plug connector part, wherein said             
               adapter is further provided with two power contacts that are arranged at the side            
               of said adapter.                                                                             
                      The examiner relies on the following references:                                      
               Clarke et al. (Clarke)    4,611,875                 Sep. 16, 1986                            
               German Utility Model      201 06 297 U1             Aug.   9, 2001                           
               Application (“DE ‘297”)                                                                      
                                                                                                           
                      The following rejection is on appeal before us:                                       
                      Claims 1, 4, and 6-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                
               unpatentable over DE ‘297 in view of Clarke.                                                 
                      Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make               
               reference to the briefs1 and the answer for the respective details thereof.                  




                                                                                                           
               1 Although an appeal brief was initially filed on Sept. 2, 2005, a substitute appeal brief was filed
               Jan. 19, 2006 in response to a notice of non-compliance under 37 CFR 41.37.  Throughout this 
               opinion, we refer to the substitute brief filed Jan. 19, 2006 (hereafter “brief”).           

                                                     2                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007