Ex Parte Lai et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2006-2835                                                                             
                Application 10/033,496                                                                       

                   [a]s to the toughness, it is noted that Dontula ‘976 does expressly                       
                   teach that the upper and lower sheets are chosen to satisfy specific                      
                   requirements of properties, such as flexural modulus, etc. In                             
                   particular, a toughness related problem with the element in cutting,                      
                   punching, slitting, and chopping during transport through a                               
                   photofinishing equipment is solved (column 5, lines 45-64).                               
                   [Answer 3-4; original emphasis deleted.]                                                  
                      Thus, the Examiner concludes that                                                      
                   Dontula ‘976 does teach exactly the same subject matter (an                               
                   imaging member of the same laminate structure and comprising                              
                   exactly the same polymers), made by  exactly the same process                             
                   (coextrusion, quenching, orienting, heat setting and laminating),                         
                   and having the same toughness related required properties for                             
                   application processing (i.e., having suitable cutting, slitting and                       
                   chopping properties to be processed through a photofinishing                              
                   equipment) as the instant invention . . . [and] although Dontula ‘976                     
                   is silent about the toughness data, a suitable toughness of each layer                    
                   is also clearly anticipated by Dontula ‘976, because the imaging                          
                   member meets the same toughness related required properties for                           
                   processing through a photofinishing equipment.  [Answer 4.]                               
                      Appellants submit that Dontula ‘976 is not anticipatory because it                     
                does not describe “toughness” for the sheets in the base component, arguing                  
                that this property “is dependent upon issues such as chemical structure,                     
                crosslinking, and the amount and direction of orientation of the polymer                     
                sheet,” and “not directly dependent upon modulus and . . . may differ                        
                substantially among materials with a similar modulus” (Br. 5).  Appellants                   
                argue that “[t]oughness and modulus are distinct properties,” explaining the                 
                difference (id. 6-7).  In response, the Examiner admits that “there is no                    
                constant correlation between toughness and modulus” but maintains the                        
                grounds of rejection because “nowhere does Dontula ‘976 teach an imaging                     
                element which differs from the instant invention in structure, composition,                  

                                                    - 5 -                                                    


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007