|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Ex Parte Klivington et al - Page 10Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Klivington et al - Page 10
Appeal Number: 2006-3365
Application Number: 10/329,921
(Paragraph 221).
Clearly Raveis, Jr. teaches creating additional contract files automatically by
operation of the system. Therefore, we find that both Raveis, Jr. and Broerman
suggest the limitation of adding files automatically for contract addenda or
disclaimers, and find appellants’ argument to be unpersuasive.
Accordingly we sustain the examiner's rejection of claims 11 and 12 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Broerman, Raveis, Jr. and the Virginia
Regional Sales Contract.
CONCLUSION
To summarize,
• The rejection of claims 1 through 10 and 13 through 26 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as obvious over Broerman and Raveis, Jr. is sustained.
• The rejection of claims 11 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
Broerman, Raveis, Jr. and the Virginia Regional Sales Contract is sustained.
10
|