onecle - legal research

Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Hudson - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2006 > Ex Parte Hudson - Page 1

Sponsored Links




                                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                             
                                     written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                                                                                                   

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                
                                                           __________                                                               
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                  
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                  Ex parte JOHN E. HUDSON                                                           
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-3367                                                          
                                                   Application No. 09/849,927                                                       
                                                           __________                                                               
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                           __________                                                               
                   Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                   HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           

                           This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6 through 21, and                      
                   23 through 29.                                                                                                   
                           The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for equalizing a data                             
                   stream generated from a plurality of space time coded (STC) data streams, and received                           
                   from a plurality of transmit antenna elements.                                                                   
                           Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                               
                           1. A method of channel equalisation comprising:                                                          
                                  receiving a data stream generated from a plurality of space time coded                            
                           (STC) data streams received from a plurality of transmit antenna elements;                               
                                  generating via a fast transform a packet spectrum of at least a portion of                        
                           the data stream, the packet spectrum being a transform domain representation;                            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007