The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte JOSEPH DAVID RIGNEY and MAGDI NAIM AZER
___________
Appeal No. 2006-0866
Application No. 10/086,148
Technology Center 3700
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Decided: February 27, 2007
___________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and
ANTON W. FETTING Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2 to 27, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claim 1 has been cancelled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013