Ex Parte Webster et al - Page 6

              Appeal Number:  2006-0965                                                                                 
              Application Number: 10/827,051                                                                            

              Vreeland discloses (col. 1, ll. 32-34) that the base plate contains a plurality of                        
              tapered holes for receiving perforated stoppers, and that the base plate is slidable                      
              within recess 30 in the base 10.  Thus we find from Vreeland that perforated                              
              stoppers 29 are placed in the apertures 26-28 and that the base plate 25 is slidable                      
              in recess 30 to allow for different size tapered apertures (col. 2, l. 20).  From the                     
              disclosure of sliding the base plate in the recess to permit a stopper in different                       
              tapered apertures to receive a glass tube, we find that the disclosure of Vreeland                        
              meets the claimed "plurality of stoppers switchably exclusively interposed between                        
              said surface and said biasing device along said axis" as recited in claim 24.  Note                       
              that the "said surface" is recess 30 of base 10, and that the axis is the axis of the                     
              glass tube 31.   In addition, we find that recess 30 meets the claimed surface across                     
              from the biasing device as the recess is across from the biasing device 18, 21, and                       
              23.  However, it is at this point that we part company with the examiner.  Although                       
              the surface 30 is across from the biasing device along the axis, claim 24 requires                        
              more.  The claim additionally recites that the surface is configured to oppose the                        
              compression force.  In Vreeland, the opposition to the compressive force is                               
              provided by the surfaces of the stoppers that engage the glass tube.  These surfaces                      
              are part of the stopper, and not part of the surface that is across from the biasing                      
              device, i.e., the recess 30.  The stoppers are between the surface and the biasing                        
              device, and are a separate element from the stoppers.  Thus, we cannot rely upon                          
              the perforations in the stoppers 29 to meet the claimed surface.  In recess 30, we                        
              find an aperture, unnumbered, in figure 1, which receives the glass tube.  However,                       
              even though the drawings are not drawn to scale, it appears that the glass tube goes                      
              through this aperture without opposition.                                                                 
              From our review of Vreeland, we find no disclosure that this unnumbered                                   
              aperture in recess 30 is configured to oppose the compressive force.  Accordingly,                        

                                                           6                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013