onecle

Ex Parte SurfControl, Inc. et al - Page 1




        1       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
        2                    and is not binding precedent of the Board            
        3                                                                         
        4         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
        5                       __________________                                
        6                                                                         
        7             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
        8                      AND INTERFERENCES                                  
        9                       __________________                                
        10                                                                        
        11                  Ex parte SURFCONTROL, INC.                            
        12                                                                        
        13                      Appeal No. 2006-1084                              
        14              Reexamination Control Number 90/006,334                   
        15                     Patent No. 6,219,786 B1                            
        16                     Technology Center 2100                             
        17                      __________________                                
        18                                                                        
        19                           On Brief                                     
        20                    Decided: February 27, 2007                          
        21                      __________________                                
        22                                                                       
        23                                                                        
        24  Before LEE E. BARRETT, JAMESON LEE and JAMES T. MOORE,                
        25  Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
        26                                                                        
        27  LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     
        28                                                                        
        29                       DECISION ON APPEAL                               
        30  A. Statement of the Case                                              
        31      This is a decision on appeal by the Patent Owner under 35 U.S.C.  
        32   134(b) and  306 from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of the Claims 1-18
        33  in Patent No. 6,219,786 B1.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013